All have already got used to that women are engaged in housekeeping and education of children. So there lived our grandmothers and mums so the majority of families continues to live now. But there are situations when the woman earns more men or simply does not wish to lose a high position in a society, here then and it is necessary the husband to take all female "problems on itself."
Many are indignant: «As it so? The muzhik keeps the house, cooks borsches and changes diapers?» Someone takes of a neutral position: «In a life everyone happens, but the husband all the same should earn, and the wife to be engaged in the house». And someone perceives such situation absolutely normally. But why it is more than opponents of a man's household?
1. All business in out-of-date concepts. All changes, it is not necessary on a place, but many still live by a principle «the Place of the woman on kitchen». Probably, because earlier female work was paid less. Probably све has put discrimination: men always held a post of directors.
2. There was a concept «Not man's this business». After day of work the muzhik fell on a sofa with a newspaper, and the wife after the same working hours "went on the second change" – washing, cleaning, cooking, care of children. Participation of the spouse in household questions was regarded as something low, and not only its friends, but also parents.
3. Mum all the same is necessary to the newborn child, and appearance at work for the tenth day after a birth of the kid can be justified only a desperate situation.
But if in a life has developed so, what you have a fine, demanded trade which is paid adequately for comfortable existence, you very much respect the employee, and the child is still small for a kindergarten, but does not demand constant mum's attention why not to change over for the spouse? And What difference WHO brings money in the family budget if such situation suits all members of a family?
Someone will tell that the idle man feels not taken place in a life that it will leave traces on its mentality. But it not so. And if the man working all the day long brings one pennies? Whether he can quite consider itself(himself) as the successful man?
Whether it is necessary to deprive the family of many possibilities for the sake of public opinion? Besides, such men understand on a private experience all that complexity of a housework and on care of children and any more will not throw to the spouse: «Well, you keep the house also do nothing. You will think, has washed, has stroked, has made a supper etc.» And who has told what look after small children mums can only? That the daddy spends time most part with the child, pulls together it with it much more, than with the daddy who waves away from the son, and time only on days off finds for it.
It is not necessary to consider men who have devoted itself to the house and a family spineless beings and rags. On the contrary, it is people who were not afraid to change the social status for the sake of well-being of the family.
Learn it is more: http://blonderussianwomen.blogspot.com/
http://marrie-ddating.blogspot.com/
http://free-girls.w-ru.com
Russian brides ckub
2 years ago
